Pakistan, a country grappling with terrorism, political instability, and economic challenges, has once again found itself in a precarious diplomatic situation with its long-time ally, China. The latest controversy centers around Pakistan's attempt to negotiate over the use of Gwadar port in Balochistan, which is part of the ambitious China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). During a high-level meeting, Pakistan reportedly demanded that China provide a second-strike nuclear capability in exchange for permission to establish a Chinese military base at the strategically important Gwadar port. This demand, which bordered on a threat, was rejected by China, leading to a halt in talks and significant diplomatic tension between the two countries.

This breakdown in talks is a major blow to Pakistan, which heavily relies on China for military support and economic bailouts. Despite the growing discontent within Pakistan over issues like rigged elections and civil unrest, the country cannot afford to anger China, as it depends on Beijing for both arms supplies and financial assistance. However, Pakistan's unexpected demand for a nuclear triad and second-strike nuclear capability is unrealistic, as it would involve China violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), of which it is a signatory. Such a move would risk severe international sanctions and global isolation for China.

Additionally, Pakistan's recent actions, such as preventing the Chinese Navy from making a port call at Gwadar during a joint naval exercise, have further strained relations. This decision, influenced by U.S. pressure, reflects Pakistan's delicate balancing act between its alliances with China and the United States. In the face of these tensions, Pakistan's demand for a second-strike nuclear capability seems to be driven by its long-standing desire to match India’s nuclear capabilities, without regard for the broader geopolitical consequences.